EX CONSTABLE RAJIV KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to consider and decide the representation dated 25.11.2024 (Annexure P-8), submitted by the petitioner as per law, in…
Judgment
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA *** Present :- Mr. Raj Kumar Arya, Advocate for the petitioner. *** Deepinder Singh Nalwa, J. (Oral)
In the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 11.06.2024 (Annexure P-4) passed by respondent No.4 to an extent that the petitioner has been denied salary for the intervening period from 01.10.2004 to 11.06.2024.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that once the petitioner has been exonerated in the enquiry, there is no justification for denying him the salary for the period from 01.10.2004 to
11.06.2024, i.e., from the date of dismissal till reinstatement in service.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that although the impugned order was passed on 11.06.2024 (Annexure P-4), the petitioner thereafter, has filed a representation wherein, he has given details of similarly situated persons who have been granted the salary from the date of CWP-10970-2026 :2: their dismissal till reinstatement on account of exoneration in the departmental proceedings/criminal proceedings.
Learned counsel, on instructions from the petitioner, submits that at this stage, petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is given to respondent No.4 to decide the representation dated 25.11.2024 (Annexure P- 8) submitted by the petitioner in light of the orders dated 02.06.2020 (Annexure P-5) and 26.05.2025 (Annexures P-6 and P-7), in a time bound manner.
Notice of motion. Mr. Rohit Ahuja, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents and does not object to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
Operative part
In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to consider and decide the representation dated 25.11.2024 (Annexure P-8), submitted by the petitioner as per law, in light of the orders dated
02.06.2020 (Annexure P-5) and 26.05.2025 (Annexures P-6 and P-7), within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order in accordance with law. (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE
10.04.2026 Rimpal Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable : Yes/No Yes/No
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 10 Apr 2026. The bench was DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.