✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 14 Sep 2012

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM M-23317 of 2012 Date of Decision: September 14 & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

M M S BEDI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

This petition is disposed of with a direction that final decision

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI. -.- Present:- Mr.S.K. Panwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Subhash Godara, Addl.A.G., Haryana. Mr. M.S. Rana, Advocate for the complainant. -.- M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL) Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 224 dated August 19, 2011 under Sections 376 (2) IPC registered at Police Station Hathin, District Palwal, claiming that the matter has been compromised. No doubt, respondent No.3 prosecutrix is present in the Court but State counsel on the instructions of HC Harpal Singh has informed that cancellation report has already been submitted in the case. CRM M-23317 of 2012 [2] This petition is disposed of with a direction that final decision will be taken by the higher authorities regarding cancellation of the FIR within a period of one month and in case approved, the cancellation report will be presented within a period of 15 days thereafter before the Illaqa Magistrate. It will be open to the complainant-respondent No.2 and prosecutrix respondent No.3 to appear before the Court and make a statement regarding their consent for cancellation of the FIR. Since the prosecutrix claims that she is happily married, it is directed that the Court concerned will dispose of the matter expeditiously on appearance of the complainant before the Court concerned. September 14, 2012 sanjay (M.M.S.BEDI) JUDGE

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This petition is disposed of with a direction that final decision

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 376(2).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 14 Sep 2012. The bench was M M S BEDI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments