✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 22 Jul 2011

Smt. Shikha v. Yes/No

Criminal Revision No. 1908 of 2010JASBIR SINGH, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No To be referred to the Reporters or not?Yes/No Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No Jasbir Singh, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of…

Judgment

Smt. Shikha Krishan Versus .......Petitioner ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present: Mr. Surender Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No To be referred to the Reporters or not?Yes/No Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No Jasbir Singh, J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the order passed in FAO No. 103-M of 2010 titled as Smt. Shikha versus Krishan decided on 15.02.2011 he wishes to withdraw this petition. Ordered accordingly. [JASBIR SINGH] JUDGE 22nd July, 2011 Shivani Kaushik [AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH] JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Revision No. 1908 of 2010). ← Search more judgments