Pushpa Devi v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition stands disposed of in the above terms
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Operative part
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI PRESENT: Mr. S.K. Tamak, Advocate, for the petitioner. JUDGMENT M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral) This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing order dated 31.8.2006 (P-5) whereby respondent No. 4 has been transferred in place of the petitioner at Government High School, Pipli, District Kurukshetra, without assigning any reasons whatsoever in violation of the transfer policy of the respondent State. The petitioner has also sought quashing of relieving order dated 2.9.2006 (P-6). A further prayer has been made to direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue work on the post of Math-mistress at Government High School, Pipli, District Kurukshetra. CWP No. 14252 of 2006 2 For the relief claimed in the instant petition, the petitioner has already sent a representation, dated 2.9.2006 (P-8) to respondent No. 2. Without going into the merits of the case, we deem it just and appropriate to direct respondent No. 2 to take cognizance of the representation, dated 2.9.2006 (P-8) sent by the petitioner and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is presented to them. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (M.M. KUMAR) JUDGE (M.M.S. BEDI) JUDGE September 7, 2006 Pkapoor
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition stands disposed of in the above terms
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 07 Sep 2006. The bench was M M KUMAR, M M S BEDI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.