At Chandigarh v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 01 Apr 2024
- Bench
- GURVINDER SINGH GILL
- Neutral citation
- 2024:PHHC:42577
Outcome
Disposed of
petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners but without commenting anything as regards the veracity of the averments made in the petition or as regards the sanctity of alleged relationship or age of the petitioners, the petition is disposed of with a direction…
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG, Haryana. ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral)
Petitioner No.1 – Priya aged about 17 years and petitioner No.2 – Happy aged about 26 years, both of whom are in a ‘live-in’ relationship, have approached this Court seeking issuance of a direction to official respondents to protect their lives and liberty as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of private respondents No.4 to 8, who do not approve of their ‘live-in’ relationship.
Operative part
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners but without commenting anything as regards the veracity of the averments made in the petition or as regards the sanctity of alleged relationship or age of the petitioners, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 – Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar to look into the matter and to dispose off the Pankaj Kakkar 2024.04.01 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRWP-2840-2024 (O&M) ( 2 ) representation dated 22.3.2024 (Annexure P-2) in accordance with law. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the lives and liberty of the petitioners, then necessary steps warranted under law be taken thereupon at the earliest so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
A copy of this order along with copy of the representation dated 22.3.2024 (Annexure P-2) be sent to respondent No.2 – Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar so as to enable him to do the needful expeditiously.
It is, however, clarified that the aforesaid order shall not be taken to be any expression as regards the alleged relationship or age of the petitioners and shall not confer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that they have committed any wrong.
1.4.2024 Geeta ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No Pankaj Kakkar 2024.04.01 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 01 Apr 2024. The bench was GURVINDER SINGH GILL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.