Gurjant Singh & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 06 Sep 2024
- Bench
- GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 323, 324
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. In view of the aforesaid compromise and bearing in mind the law laid In view of the aforesaid compromise and bearing in mind the law laid In view of the aforesaid compromise and bearing in mind the law laid In view of the aforesaid…
Judgment
GURVINDER SINGH GILL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL CORAM: Present: Mr. T.P.Singh Makkar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. T.P.Singh Makkar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Prabhdeep Singh Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Prabhdeep Singh Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab. /s Manish Bansal & Satnam Singh, Advocates, M/s Manish Bansal & Satnam Singh, Advocates, for respondents No.2 & 3. GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral) GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.
The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. The petitioners seek 0030 dated 25.04.2012 quashing of FIR No.0030 dated 25.04.2012 323, registered at Police Station Jaito, District Faridkot, under Sections 323, registered at Police Station Jaito, District Faridkot, under Sections registered at Police Station Jaito, District Faridkot, under Sections and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the 324, 34 IPC and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the 324, 34 IPC basis of a compromise stated to have been effected between the parties. basis of a compromise stated to have been effected between the parties basis of a compromise stated to have been effected between the parties
, the parties had been directed to appear Vide order dated 22.04.2024, the parties had been directed to appear , the parties had been directed to appear Vide order dated before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court so as to get their statements before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court so as to get their statements before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court so as to get their statements before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court so as to get their statements recorded qua the factum of compromise. recorded qua the factum of compromise.
Report of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jaitu Report of learned , has been Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jaitu, has been received, wherein received, wherein received, wherein received, wherein it has been reported it has been reported it has been reported it has been reported the statements of the statements of the statements of the statements of accused/petitioners, namely, Gurjant Singh and Sukhmander Singh accused/petitioners, namely, Gurjant Singh and Sukhmander Singh as well as of complainant Sikander Singh and injured Baldev Singh well as of complainant Sikander Singh and injured Baldev Singh have VIMAL KUMAR 2024.09.06 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-19444 9444-2024 (O&M) 2 omised the matter been recorded to the effect that they have compromised the matter been recorded to the effect that they have compr been recorded to the effect that they have compr amongst themselves. amongst themselves.
and injured, namely Sikander Singh and Baldev Singh The complainant and injured, namely Sikander Singh and Baldev Singh and injured, namely Sikander Singh and Baldev Singh The complainant respectively, in their statements have stated that respectively, in their no objection in stated that they have no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed. case the FIR in question is quashed.
The learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jaitu The learned , has specifically Magistrate, Jaitu, has specifically opined that the parties have entered into compromise without any opined that the parties have entered into compromise without any opined that the parties have entered into compromise without any opined that the parties have entered into compromise without any coercion or undue influence. coercion or undue influence.
In view of the aforesaid compromise and bearing in mind the law laid In view of the aforesaid compromise and bearing in mind the law laid In view of the aforesaid compromise and bearing in mind the law laid In view of the aforesaid compromise and bearing in mind the law laid down by Full Bench of this Court in 2007(3) RC down by Full Bench of this Court in R (Crl.) 1052 Kulwinder 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 Kulwinder , the present petition is allowed and Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, the present petition is allowed and , the present petition is allowed and Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 0030 dated 25.04.2012 registered at Police Station Jaito, District FIR No.0030 dated 25.04.2012 registered at Police Station Jaito, District 0030 dated 25.04.2012 registered at Police Station Jaito, District 0030 dated 25.04.2012 registered at Police Station Jaito, District and all subsequent Faridkot, under Sections 323, 324, 34 IPC and all subsequent Faridkot, under Sections 323, 324, 34 IPC Faridkot, under Sections 323, 324, 34 IPC herefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. proceedings emanating t
06.09.2024 06.09.202 Vimal GURVINDER SINGH GILL) (GURVINDER SINGH GILL JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: VIMAL KUMAR 2024.09.06 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 323, 324.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 06 Sep 2024. The bench was GURVINDER SINGH GILL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.