RAJ KUMAR AND ORS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Neeraj Yadav, for the petitioners. Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. for respondent Nos.2 to 7. Mr. Sandeep Berwal, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 7. Mr. Sandeep Berwal, Advocate ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)

1. Bharatiya Nagarik This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik This is a petition filed under Section This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 FIR No.408, dated for quashing of FIR No.408, dated

30.09.2017, under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 506 of IPC 30.09.2017, under Sections 191(2), 147, 148, 323 and 506 of IPC (Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(2)(3) of BNS) and Section 25 of Arms Act (Sections 191(3), 115(2), 351(2)(3) of BNS 325 and Section 25 of Arms Act (Sections 325 (117(2) BNS) added later on and Section 25 of and 326 (118(2) BNS) of IPC added later on and Section 25 of added later on and Section 25 of Arms Act deleted later on), registered at PS Bilaspur, District Gurugram, Arms Act deleted later on), registered at PS Bilaspur, District Gurugram, Arms Act deleted later on), registered at PS Bilaspur, District Gurugram, Arms Act deleted later on), registered at PS Bilaspur, District Gurugram, (Annexure P-1) and 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on t he basis of subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 2). compromise dated 25.02.2026 (Annexure P-2). compromise dated 25.02.2026 (Annexure P

2. This Court vide order dated 30.04.2026 This had directed the parties 30.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded port qua the genuineness and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its re and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its re of the compromise. of the compromise. GURPREET 2026.05.19 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-13009 13009-2026 (O&M) 2

3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pataudi, Gurugram, Judicial Magistrate First Class and got their statements , Pataudi, Gurugram, and got their statements agistrate First recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Class, Pataudi, Gurugram , Pataudi, Gurugram has submitted report dated to the effect has submitted report dated 11.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. without any coercion or undue influence.

4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 to Learned State counsel as well as counsel for Learned State counsel as well as counsel for have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 7 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.

5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.

6. down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court