COCP NO P NO.1249 OF 2025 (O&M) Gram Panchay nchayat village Bora v. Ve Happy and ano d another
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The main writ petition being CWP The g CWP No.210 of 2008 has been decided by an o y an order of even date and the impug impugned orders dated September SHALINI BHATIA 2026.02.13 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this…
Judgment
Judgment
#1. 2. 3. 4. Whether date when the judgment is reserved ounced date when the judgment is pronounce date when the judgment is uploaded the judgment is ether only operative part of the ju judgment the full nounced or whether nounced delay, if any of the pronounceme ment, and reasons thereof pronounce pronounce The delay judgment,
28.01.2026 12.02.2026 13.02.2026 Full ncement of full Not applicable
CORAM : HO HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEP HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPIT HO DEEPAK SIBAL APITA BANERJI Present : Mr Mr. Vishal Sharma (Vasudeva), Ad for the petitioner. Advocate, LAPITA BANE ANERJI, J. The petitioner-Gram Panchayat The ayat filed the instant contempt petition alleging lleging violation of the order dated J ated January 09, 2008, passed in CWP No.210 o .210 of 2008. The order dated Janua January 09, 2008 is reproduced herein after: “ Notice of motion for 11.02.20
02.2008. In the meantime, status quo quo regarding possession shall be maintained.” No notice has yet been issued in the No in the contempt petition.
#2. The main writ petition being CWP The g CWP No.210 of 2008 has been decided by an o y an order of even date and the impug impugned orders dated September SHALINI BHATIA 2026.02.13 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP No.1249 of 249 of 2025 15, 2004 and Se and September 13, 2007, challenged in ged in the writ petition, have been set-aside. The in The interim order dated January 09, 2 y 09, 2008, the violation of which has been compl complained of by the Gram Panchaya nchayat has merged into the final order passed in sed in the writ petition by this Benc s Bench by holding that prior to establishing of of the Gram Panchayat’s title to the land in question, the petitioner canno cannot be evicted therefrom. Therefo herefore, no further order needs to be passed in t d in the present contempt petition. tition. Accordingly, the same is disposed of. (DEEPAK SIB DGE JUDGE SIBAL) (LAPITA BANERJI) (LA JUDGE FEBRUARY Shalini 12, 2026 Whether speakin Whether reporta speaking/reasoned: reportable: Ye Yes/No Yes/No Ye SHALINI BHATIA 2026.02.13 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.