✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 27 Feb 2024

Kashmir Singh v. Director, Rural Development & Panchayats, Punjab & Ors.

KASHMIR SINGH CWP No. 4413 of 2024RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Case at a glance

Decided
27 Feb 2024
Bench
RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Neutral citation
2024:PHHC:26828

Provisions considered

Judgment

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: *** Mr. B. S. Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. *** RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Present writ petition has been filed for directing respondent No.1 i.e. Director, Rural Development & Panchayats, Punjab to decide the petition bearing No.212 of 2023 titled as “Gurdeep Singh versus Gram Panchayat & another” (Annexure P-11) . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has filed the petition under Section 199 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 for cancellation of the resolution dated

26.05.2022 passed by the Gram Panchayat Lassara, Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar being illegal and arbitrary before respondent No.1. He further submits that despite the submission of written arguments by the petitioner, respondent No.1 has failed to decide the petition. Notice of motion to the official respondents at this stage. RITTU 2024.02.27 13:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.4413 of 2024 -2- On asking of the Court, Mr. Navneet Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State. He has submitted that the petition filed by the petitioner would be decided expeditiously. In view of the above position, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 i.e. Director, Rural Development & Panchayats, Punjab to take up the petition filed by the petitioner and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

27.02.2024 (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No RITTU 2024.02.27 13:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 — s. 199.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 27 Feb 2024. The bench was RAJESH BHARDWAJ.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. KASHMIR SINGH CWP No. 4413 of 2024). ← Search more judgments