CRM-M No. 8753 of 2025 · Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2025
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid
Provisions considered
- Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ss. 21B, 27A, 29
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. MEENU 2025.02.18 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Allowed as prayed for. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. In CRM-M-8753-2025 -2- case the petitioner surrenders and applies for regular bail before the concerned Court within a week…
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr.D.S.Virk Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Kirpal Singh Thakur, AAG, Haryana with SI Yashpal Singh. ........ RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL)
Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.235, dated 18.04.2022, under Sections 21B and 27A of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Section 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 added later on) , registered at Police Station Aadampur, District Hisar.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to surrender and file an appropriate application for bail before the trial Court. He further prays that direction be issued to learned trial Court to decide his bail application in a time bound manner.
Operative part
MEENU 2025.02.18 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Allowed as prayed for. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. In CRM-M-8753-2025 -2- case the petitioner surrenders and applies for regular bail before the concerned Court within a week from today, then the Court concerned would decide the same expeditiously preferably within one week from the date of its filing, in accordance with law. February 17, 2025 meenuss 1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? 2. Whether reportable ? ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MEENU 2025.02.18 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — ss. 21B, 27A, 29.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 17 Feb 2025. The bench was RAJESH BHARDWAJ.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.