Criminal Misc. No.34231-M of 2007 v. State of Haryana
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present:- Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Navneet Singh, AAG, Haryana. **** RAJESH BINDAL, J. The allegations against the petitioners in the FIR are that they were taking 9 cows to Rajasthan. They were caught near the border of Rajasthan while taking the cows. They were booked under Sections 4-A/8, 2/80 of Punjab Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. There is nothing on record to even suggest that the petitioners are either in dairy business or in the trade of cattles. Their village is situated far off from the place from where they were apprehended along with the cows. In these facts, I do not deem it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Dismissed. February 05, 2008 ( RAJESH BINDAL ) JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.