Mohammad Latif v. State of Punjab
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL * * * Present : Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jasmeet Bhinder, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Chauhan, AAG, Punjab. * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Pargatjeet Singh, states that prosecution evidence was closed on 06.07.2010 and statements of accused under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have also since been recorded and the case is now fixed for 23.07.2010 in the trial court for defence evidence and arguments. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant bail petition. Dismissed as not pressed. July 20, 2010 monika ( L. N. MITTAL ) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 313.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 20 Jul 2010. The bench was L N MITTAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.