PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3892-2022 Date of Decision : February 17 v. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DISTRICT FAZILKA & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 17 Feb 2026
- Bench
- KULDEEP TIWARI
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of. The parties are directed to strictly adhere to and abide by the terms and conditions embodied in the settlement deed/affidavit dated
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Ms. Kiranjeet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, A.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No.3(a) to 3(e). *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
Through the present writ petition, a prayer has been made for setting aside the order dated 09.11.2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal, as well as the order dated 31.12.2020 passed by the Maintenance Tribunal.
At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that, in view of an amicable settlement arrived at between the parties, no cause for further adjudication survives in the present writ petition. A vernacular copy of the settlement deed/affidavit dated 16.06.2025 has also been placed on record.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 3(a) to 3(e), who are legal representatives of the deceased senior citizen, fairly DEVINDER YADAV 2026.02.18 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-3892-2022 2 concedes the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner regarding the amicable resolution of the dispute.
In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of. The parties are directed to strictly adhere to and abide by the terms and conditions embodied in the settlement deed/affidavit dated
16.06.2025. February 17, 2026 devinder (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : : Whether Reportable Yes/No Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2026.02.18 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.