✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 05 Apr 2025

JAB AND HARYANA AT v. SUDHIR SINGH

Cwp No. 6136 of 1992SUDHIR SINGH, SUKHVINDER KAUR

Case at a glance

Decided
05 Apr 2025
Bench
SUDHIR SINGH, SUKHVINDER KAUR

Outcome

Disposed of

the present writ petition is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE April 05, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.16 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment 2 of 2

Judgment

JAB AND HARYANA AT THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB ARH CHANDIGARH CWP-6136-1992 (O&M) M) 2025 Date of decision: April 05, 2025 Da Vinod Garg The Notified Ar fied Area Committee, Manimajra versus ….Petitioner ….Respondent CORAM: HO HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUK HO SUDHIR SINGH SUKHVINDER KAUR Present:- Mr Mr. Arun Bansal, Advocate for the for the petitioner. SUDHIR SING SINGH, J. (ORAL) ***** The petitioner has sought issuanc Th re of issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus dire directing the respondent not to d f the t to deduct more than 10% of the amount deposite eposited by the petitioner.

2.

A full Bench of this Court, vide ord A f ed in ide order dated 12.03.2025 passed in CWP-2903-200 2001 titled as Krishna Kumar mar Nanda and others versus Commissioner, ioner, Municipal Corporation, C n, Chandigarh and others, has answered the re the reference made to it in respect of pect of issue involved in the present writ petition.

Operative part

3.

In view of the decision of the fu In 2001 the full Bench in CWP-2903 2001 (supra), the pre the present writ petition is disposed of sed of in same terms. MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.16 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment 2 1 of 2 CWP-6136-1992 (O&M)

4.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE April 05, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.16 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment 2 of 2

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: the present writ petition is disposed of

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 05 Apr 2025. The bench was SUDHIR SINGH, SUKHVINDER KAUR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Cwp No. 6136 of 1992). ← Search more judgments