Cwp No. 5154 of 2025 · Punjab Jab And Haryana High Court · 2025
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE April 30, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.06 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment 2 of 2
Judgment
CORAM: HO HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK HO SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN Present:- Mr Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate for the the petitioners. Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG Ms , AAG Punjab. SUDHIR SING SINGH, J. (ORAL) ***** Present Writ Petition herein, inter Pre nter alia, is for issuance of a Writ Writ in the nature of ture of Mandamus directing responde pondents No.1 to 4 not to pass site plan of respond espondents No.5 and 6 being in viola violation of the Zoning Bye Laws and Building La ing Laws as applicable to the Urban A rban Area of Rupnagar.
At the outset, learned counsel fo At sel for the petitioners submits that petitioners wou would be satisfied, in case, their their pending legal notice dated
27.11.2024 (An 4 (Annexure P-6) is considered and , and decided by respondent No.3, which has not b not been adverted to by the responden pondents till date.
On the other hand, on advance On ition, vance service of copy of petition, learned State co counsel appears and opposes issu She es issuance of notice of motion. She submits that gr grievance of the petitioners will will be looked into by respondent MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.06 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment 2 1 of 2 CWP-5154-2025 (O&M) No.3 and it shall take decision either way, on the pending legal notice dated
27.11.2024 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioners.
Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.
Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider the pending legal notice dated 27.11.2024 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioners and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE April 30, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.06 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment 2 of 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.