PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-5860-2024 Date of Decision : February 05 v. STATE OF HARYANA
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 05 Feb 2024
- Bench
- KULDEEP TIWARI
- Neutral citation
- 2024:PHHC:15001
Outcome
Withdrawn
Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Permission granted. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. February 05, 2024 devinder (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : : Whether Reportable Yes/No Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2024.02.06 09:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Kanhiya Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, D.A.G., Haryana. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
Through the instant petition, as instituted under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner has sought the concession of anticipatory bail, in case FIR No.485 dated 27.11.2023, under Section 20(c) of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985, registered at P.S. Bhuna, District Fatehabad.
After addressing arguments for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
Operative part
Permission granted. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. February 05, 2024 devinder (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : : Whether Reportable Yes/No Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2024.02.06 09:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — s. 20(c).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 05 Feb 2024. The bench was KULDEEP TIWARI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.