IN TH v. YASHPAL SING
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
petition is disposed of, however, with
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of above, the present petitio In vi petition is disposed of, however, with r, with a direction to res respondent No.2 to release the am he amount in favour of the petition etitioner within a period of riod of two weeks after…
Judgment
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH ESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate for the for the petitioner. Mr. R Mr. Rishi Kaushal, Advocate with Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocate for Mr. B te for respondent No.1. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. Mr. A HARKESH MAN **** MANUJA, J. (Oral)
#1. By way of present petition filed By w filed under Sections 10 & 12 of th of the Contempt of Cou f Courts Act, 1971, read with Article rticle 215 of the Constitution of Indi f India, contempt proceed roceedings are sought to be initiated itiated against the respondents toward towards alleged willful llful non-compliance of orders dat dated 22.12.2017, 29.04.2016 an 16 and
15.01.2014 passe passed by this Court in CWP No. No.3766 of 2017, COCP No.1717 1717 of 2014 and CWP N WP No.504 of 2014 respectively.
#2. Learned counsel for the petitioner Lear ioner submits that amount has alread already been deposited by ited by respondent No.1 with responde pondent No.2, however, the same cou e could not be released in ased in favour of the petitioner as nec as necessary documents are incomple omplete at the instance of nce of petitioner. He further submits bmits that the needful shall be done b done by the petitioner wi er within a period of two weeks fr eks from today and payment shall released thereafte reafter.
#3. In view of above, the present petitio In vi petition is disposed of, however, with r, with a direction to res respondent No.2 to release the am he amount in favour of the petition etitioner within a period of riod of two weeks after receipt of requ f required documents.
#4. Rule stands discharged. Rule September 30, 2 Atik , 2024 (HARKESH MANUJA) (HA JUDGE Whe Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Whe Yes/N Yes/No Yes/No Yes/N MOHMED ATIK 2024.10.04 09:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is disposed of, however, with
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Courts Act, 1971; Constitution of India.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.