Satnam Singh v. Narinder Singh & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With this observation, petition stands disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORUM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. AGGARWAL .*.*.*. Present: Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate. Mr. Hitesh Kaplish, Advocate. M.M. AGGARWAL,J This is petition against order dated 9.8.2005 passed by Civil Judge(Jr.Divn.), Nabha whereby objection petition filed by respondent No.2 was accepted and the property was released from attachment. On behalf of respondent No.2, it had been argued that no revision was maintainable in view of provisions of Order 21 Rule 58, Sub Rule 4 CPC and only an appeal will be maintainable. After going through the provisions of Order 21 Rule 58, Sub Rule 4 CPC, petitioner is directed to approach the Court of District Judge, Patiala. If he approaches that Court within a period of one month from C.R.No.4968 of 2005 #2# today then objections to the limitation shall not be taken. With this observation, petition stands disposed of. January 15, 2007 ( M.M. AGGARWAL ) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With this observation, petition stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — r. 4.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 15 Jan 2007. The bench was M M AGGARWAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.