CI VI L REVI SI ON v. Gunnail Singhand anot her

t ender on t he first dat e of hearingaft er t hepassingofsuch order ofassessm ent byt he Cont rollerso ast o sat is61t he oft he proviso Um a 14: 31 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh 3 Of necessit yt he dat e of flrst hearingof t he applicat ion JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document f e 1 C 0 Cao C5 I Z t r I 08 V7 Z m 54 CI VI L REVI SI ON NO 2468 OF 2008 r 1 1 would m ean t he dat e fallingaRer t he dat e of such order by Cont roller 4 On t hefailureoft het enant t o com plynot hingrem ains t o be done and an order for evict ion shall foUowf t he t enant m akes com pliancet he inquiryshall cont inue for flnally adj udicat ingupon t he disput eas t o t he arrears ofrentin I he lightof t he cont endingpleasraised by t he landlord and t he t enant beforet he Cont roller em phasissupplied 5 I ft he t lnal by t he Cont roller be at variance wit h his int erim or provisionalorder passedunder t he proviso one of t he followingt wo orders m ay be m ade dependingon t he fact s sit uat ion of a givencase I f t he am ount deposit ed by t he t enant direct is found t o be in exCeS t he Cont roller m ay a re8ind I f on t he ot her hand t he am ount deposit ed byt he t enant lS foundt o be short or deflcient m ay pass a condit ional order direct ingt enant t he Cont roller t o placet he landlord in oft he prem isesbygivinga reasonable t im et o t he t enant for payingor t enderingt he det lcit am ount failing which alone he shall be 1iab1e t o be evict ed Com plianceshall save him for evict ion 6While exercisingdiscret ion for aording t he t enant of m akinggoodt he deflcit one of t he relevant fact ors t o be t aken int o considerat ion by t he Cont roller would be whet her t he t enant has paid or t endered wit h subst ant ialregularlyt he rent Um a 14: 31 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh duringt hependencyoft he fallingdue m ont h by m ont h JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 55 f e CI VI L REVI SI ON NO 2468 OF 2008 6 The above said conclusions were different lyby t wo leam ed SingleJudgesoft his Court report edas Madan Lal and anot her v Baldev R 6200429PLR 834 and Rinder Lal Ve Gopal 1 0 0 I 0 Z C I 08 W7 Z Krishan 200629PR up before 124 To resolve t he cont roversym at t er was put a Division Bench of t his Court in Civil Revision No 3577 of 2006 6Raianalias Rai Kum ar v Rakesh Kum arl which was decided on January7 2010 byopining as underl This Court is oft he view t hat t herat io ofj udgm entin Rakesh Wadhawans case supra9leaves no m anner provisionalrent of doubt t hat t he and ot her ancillarychargesassessed by t he Rent Cont roller had t o be deposit edby t he t enant on t he next dat e of hearingalongwit h arrears int erest and cost s et c m ay be det erm inedbyt he above said aut horit yThe first dat e of hearinghas also been hearinga8er t o m ean t he first dat e of det erm inat ion of provisionalrent and ot her by t he Rent Cont roller A readingof conclusions drawn in para No 30 of t he j udgm entin Rakesh Wadhawans leaves no doubt t hat if aft er det erm inat ionof t he provisionalrent a t enant fails t o depositt he sam e not hing rem ains t o be done and an order ofej ect m entofa t enant has t o bepassedThe languageofconclusion No 4 in t he said para is veryclear and needs no furt her The Couit 1S furt herof t he view t hat t he beneSt of conclusions No 5 and 6 l Um a 14: 31 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh depositof would becom e available t o a t enant only on his m akinga t he provisionalrent and ot her ancillarycharges JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 56 r4 CI VI L REVI SI ON NO 2468 OF 2008 7 det erm inedby t he Rent Cont roller and not ot herwise ll was im plicit lym ade clear t hat it is t he boundendut yoft he t enant t o depositt he provisionalrent det erm inedbyt he Rent Conuoller ot herwiseit will ent ail t he t enant s from t he prem ises ln disput eThis Court feels t hat if a t enant t he int erim order passedby t he Rent Cont roller he has an is dissat isfled wit h t o challenget he sam e before t he dat e fixed for paym entin t he higherforum 33 I n Raian alias R Kum ars case supralit was furt her observed t hat t he rat ional of provisionalassessm ent as I aid down in Rakesh 1 0 0 C 0 Z Wadhawans case is t o be discernedOom t he reasoninggivenby t he Honble Suprem eCourt in para No 29 of t he above said j udgm entThe 08 Honble Suprem eCourt has balanced t he int erest of t he landlords and t he n Z t l t enant sso as t o ensure t hat t he t enant s get ari t o depositt he rent upon det erm inat ionoft he provisionalrent I n t his case despit e grant m gan t o depositt he provisionalrent et c assessedbyt he Rent Cont roller pet it ionersfailed t o do t he needful As per above said act oft he pet it ionersno opt ionwas left wit h t heRent Cont roller exceptt o ordert heir ej ect m ent I n view of fact s m ent ioned above no case is m ade out int erference at t he inst ance of t he pet it ionersin t he j udgm entunder chailenge t herevision pet it ionis dism issed Um a 14: 31 Scanned True Copy of Original PHHC,Chandigarh Februaryo2010 DKC CHI EF JUSTI CE JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 6 t 60 10