✦ High Court of India · 30 Oct 2009

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB v. St at e of Haryana

Case Details High Court of India · 30 Oct 2009
Court
High Court of India
Decided
30 Oct 2009
Bench
Not available
Length
1,839 words

Acts & Sections

passedby Shri Naresh Kum ar I earned Addit ional Sessions Judge411 Bhiwani vide which t he appealpreferredby t he accusec revisionist s againstt he j udgm entdat ed 11 12005 and order of sent ence dat ed 121 05 passedby Shri Mahender Singh I earned Sub Divisional Judicial Magist rat eLoharu holdingt hem guilt yunder Sect ion 365 of t he 1ndian PenaI Code n short t he IPCl and t o undergorigorousim prisonm entfor a periodof 2Vz years and t o pay each for t he com m ission of t he oHence punishable JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Anit a 2013.03.25 13: 10 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh a fine of Rs001 m 0 C 0 I Z C I ot j 7 Z 401 Crim inal Revision Nl 220 of 2009 2 under Sect ion 365 I PC I n default of paym entof fine t hey were direct ed t o furt her undergoim prisonm entfor fift een days was dism issecl The brief fact s of t he prosecut ioncase are t hat 71998 ASl Saj j anSingh along wit h ot her police officials was present at Railway Chowk checkingwhere Loharu rout ine pat rollingand one Anil Kum ar m et him and got recorded his st at em ent alleging t herein t hat t here was a hearingin case FI R No133 dat ed 261 998 under Sect ion 365 I PC Police St at ion Loharu in t he Court at Loharu He cam e t o appear in t he said case alongwit h Mahender and his m at ernal uncle Harbagh At about 1 1 O al his coaccused Mandroopcam e and t ook him out of Court Cam pus where a j eepbearingregist rat ionN02CG7997 m ake Com m ander alreadypresent at t he road wherein Mashiyaalias Rishiaya Shiv Lal Aj it Mahabir and Om Parkash were sit t ing They st art ed beat inghim wit h slaps and fist s On hearinghue and cry som e persons st andingt here t hrew st ones on t he j eep but t he driver aft er put t ingt he j eep in m ot ion sped it away t owards Raj ast hat Aft er coveringdist ance of about half kilo m et er near RailwaycrossingSuraj garhroad when t he j eep becam e slow due t o speed breaker t hen he m anagedt o escape aft er get t ing him self freecl The m ot ive behind his abduct ion was pendencyof I it igat ionof accused wit h Surender Singh Sarpanchand his son On t he basis of aforesaid st at em ent t he inst ant case regist ered St at em ent s of t he Pws were Anit a 2013.03.25 13: 10 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh recorded Accused were arrest ed Aft er JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 402 Crim inal Revision No220 of 2009 3 com plet ionof invest igat ionchallan against t he accused present edfor t rial On appearance of t he pet it ionersin t he Coun copiesof t he docum ent s were suppliedt o t hem under rules Findinga prim afacie case chargeunder Sect ion 365 of t he I PC was fram ed againstt he pet it ionerst o which t he pet it ioners pleadednot guilt yand claim ed t rial Prosecut lot l t o bring hom e guilt of t he exam ined DrRaj Karan PWe1 l Mahender PW 0 C X C5 Z Man SinghPW31 ASl Saj j anSingh PW41 I nspect orRam Rat t an as PVVSI and HarbhajPWm 61ManojKum ar and t he evidence was I ot l m Z t l closed byt he Public Prosecut or The pet it ionerswere exam ined under Sect ion 313 CrC and all t he incrim inat ingevidence was put t o t hem They denied t he allegat ionsand pleadedt heir innocence The pet it ionerst endered docum ent s in defence The I earned t rial Court held t he pet it ionersguilt yunder Sect ion 365 oft he I PC and sent enced t hem as narrat ed above The pet it ionerst hereaft er filed appeal before I earned Addit ional SessionsJudge Bhiwani who findingno m erit t herein dism issed t he sam e vide j udgm entdat ed 452009 St ill feelingdissat isfied wit h t he above said j udgm ent sof convict ion t he preferredt he inst ant reviSI on pet it ion Anit a 2013.03.25 13: 10 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh 1 have heard I earned counsel for t he pet it ionersand t he JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 403 Crim inal Revision No1220 of 2009 4 0 C X C5 I Z L I ot l Z I l I earned St at e counsel and have gone t hrought he records of t he The I earned counsel for t he revisionist has subm it t ed t hat t he com plainantin t his case has not been exam ined t houghon account of his deat h The m ot ive for t he occurrence has not been proved The independent who were presentat t he t im e of allegedoccurrence has not been exam inecl The t est im onyof Mahender PW2I t he guiltof t he revisionist s and Harbhaj V61 is not sufficient t o conclude have carefullyconsidered t he said subm ission but do not find any force in t he sam e Com plainanthas died priort o t he exam inat ion and as such his nonexam inat lon is not fat al t o t he prosecut ioncaselahender Pl21 and Harbhaj N8I have supponedt he case t he prosecut ionon all m at erial part icularsand t hey have been cross exam ined at I engt hbut not hingcould be broughton t he file t o discard t heir sworn t est im ony A suggest ionhas been putt o HarbhajPV 61t hat t is correct t hat bot h t he part ieshave severe t ypeof enm it yl So lt cannot be said t hat m ot ive was not t here for kidnappingt he Bot h t he Court s below have givena concurrent finding regardingguilt of t he accused and no groundfor int erference in t hat concurrent findingregardingguiltof t he accused is m ade out There were correspondinginj urieson t he bodyof t he com plainantwhich I end furt her suppot tt o t he prosecut ionversion Anit a 2013.03.25 13: 10 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh Learned counsel for t he revisionist s has subm it t ed t hat JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 404 Crim inal Revision No 1220 of 2009 5 t m 0 0 C X 0 I Z I V Z t here is a delayin I odgingt he FI R and in t hat case prosecut ionI S 1 doubt ful have carefullyconsidered t he said argum ent sbut do not find any force ThI s aspect of t he case has been dealt in by bot h t he Court s belowThe delayst ands fullyexplainedin t he circum st ances m ent ioned So said argum ent I S wit hout any subst ance Learned counsel for t he revisionist s has furt her subm it t ed ingredientof t he offence under Sect ion 365 I PC arenot m adeout I t I S subm it t ed t hat t here is no allegat iont hat com plainantwas kidnappedand abduct ed wit h int ent ion t o cause him secret lyand wrongfullyconfinem ent So in view of aut horit yin Dhian Singh VS St at e of Puniab 2000141 RCR I Crim inall 414 t he revisionist s cannot be convict ed under Sect ion 365 I PC have carefullyconsidered t he said subm ission also but do not find any force Anil Kum ar has cat egoricallyst at ed t hat t here was enm it y bet ween t he part iesand t he accusedevisionist s have forciblyt aken him The int ent ion of t he revisionist s was sim plyt o secret lyand wrongfullyconfined him So it cannot be said t hat Sect ion 365 I PC I S not m ade out The aut horit yI ll Dhian Sinqhs case supral not helpfult o t he pet it ionersrat her is dist inguishableon t he fact s of t he presentcase Anit a 2013.03.25 13: 10 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh Last ly I earned counSeI for t he pet it ionershas subm it t ed JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 405 Crim inal Revision N1220 of 2009 6 4 t hat six persons have been sent enced t o undergot wo and half years rigorousim prisonm ent The occurrence relat es t o t he year 1998 prayerhas been m ade for reduct ion in sent ence have carefullyconsidered t he said subm ission Since t he occurrence relat es t o t he year 1998 and t he pet it ionersare undergoingprot ract edt rial so t he sent ence under Sect ion 365 1PC st ands reduced t o one year inst ead of 21z years as awarded byt he t rial Court VVit h t he m odificat ion l t he sent ence t he revI SI On pet it ionst ands disposedof accordingly A copy of t his j udgm entbe sent t o t he t rial Court for st rict com pliance Oct obeo 2009 1 JUDGE m 1 0 C X 0 I Z I 08 7 Z Qm I e 1r 1I J JY Pvl b Anit a 2013.03.25 13: 10 True Scanned Copy Of The Original PHHC,Chandigarh I JOYTI RANI 2016.03.28 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments