Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2012
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate for Mr. P.K. Mutneja, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rita Kohli, Addl.A.G., Punjab. --- RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J. Learned State counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that in…
Judgment
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? To be referred to reporters or not?
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate for Mr. P.K. Mutneja, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rita Kohli, Addl.A.G., Punjab. --- RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J. Learned State counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that in compliance with order passed by this Court, a speaking order has been passed. Counsel for the petitioner does not disputes the aforesaid fact and has stated that the instant petition be ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the aforesaid speaking order in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. September 17, 2012 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG ) COCP No.1221 of 2012 2 JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.