Ramdas Sahebrao Hon v. State Of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 ss. 65(a)(e), 81, 83, 90
Key paragraphs
- Para 88. Criminal Bail Application No. 1449 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Vivekanand 3
Judgment
Ms. Ankita A. Pawar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Ameet Palkar, APP for the Respondent – State. __________________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 11th June, 2026. P.C. :
This Bail Application is at Serial No. 117 on today’s Daily Board. Mentioned out of turn.
At 11.00 a.m. Ms. Ankita Pawar, learned Advocate for the Applicant requests for taking up this Bail Application out of turn. At her request, this Application was taken up out of turn.
Heard Ms. Ankita Pawar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. Ameet Palkar, learned APP for the Respondent-State.
By the present Application, the Applicant has sought for the Vivekanand 1 following relief in terms of prayer clause b. :-
(b) To enlarge the Applicant on regular bail in connection with Sessions case 19/2026; C. R. No. 320/2025 registered on the basis of F.I.R. dated 23/11/2025 at State Excise Department, Yeola for the offences punishable under Section 65 (a) (e), 81, 83, 90 of Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 and under Section 123 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 on such terms and conditions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and for that purpose issue necessary orders.
Ms. Ankita Pawar, learned Advocate for the Applicant, states that during the pendency of the present Application, the main Accused in Crime No. 320 of 2025 has been released on bail by the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 19 of 2025. She, therefore, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to approach the Trial Court with a fresh Application.
Request made by Ms. Ankita Pawar, learned Advocate for the Applicant, is not opposed by Mr. Ameet Palkar, learned APP for Vivekanand 2 the Respondent-State.
In view of the statement made by Ms. Ankita Pawar, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Application with liberty as prayed. If a fresh Bail Application is filed before the Trial Court, the same be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.
Criminal Bail Application No. 1449 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Vivekanand 3
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 — ss. 65(a)(e), 81, 83, 90.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 11 Jun 2026. The bench was ASHWIN D BHOBE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.