✦ Bombay High Court

Saraswati Education Society v. Employees Provident Fund & Anr.

Writ Petition No. 5114 of 2019NEERAJ P DHOTE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Application stands disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. After hearing both the sides and in view of the above, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause(a).

Judgment

1 / 3 39- wp 5114-19IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPURCIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.658 OF 2026INWRIT PETITION NO.5114 OF 2019 Saraswati Education Society Vs. Employees Provident Fund and anr.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.or directions and Registrar's orders.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. S.S.Ghate, Adv. for the petitioner Mr. A.R.Prasad, Advocate for the Respondent No.1/Applicant. CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 18/03/20261. This is an application for speaking to minutes in the judgment dated 17.11.2025.

2.

Heard both the sides. Only the correction required which appears to be the typographical error is that in paragraph Nos. 8 and 9 of the said judgment, in place of Respondent No.1, it should have been Respondent No.2. Thesame be read accordingly. Application stands disposed of.CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.659 OF 20261.This is an application for withdrawal of the amount by the petitioner/applicant, which was deposited in Kavita 2 / 3 39- wp 5114-19this Court pursuant to the order dated 25.07.2019 which reads as under:-.

Heard. Issue notice to the respondent no. 1,returnable on 07/10/2019. According to the petitioners, the liability worked out by the authorities is exorbitant and is not in consonance with the provisions of the Employees' Provident Funds and MiscellaneousProvisions Act, 1952. The learned advocate for the petitioners states that to show bonafides, the petitioners will deposit an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with the Registry of this Court till19/08/2019. Accepting the above assurance given on behalf of the petitioners, it is directed that there shall be ad-interim order in terms of prayer clause (iii) until further orders. If the petitioners fail to deposit the amount as assured, this interim order shall cease to operate from 20/08/2019 and the authorities will be at liberty to recover the amount from the petitioners

.2. Undisputedly, the Writ Petition has been finally disposed of by an order dated 17.11.2025 and the matterKavita 3 / 3 39- wp 5114-19is remanded back to the concerned Authority to be decided within stipulated period.

3.

After hearing both the sides and in view of the above, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause(a).

Operative part

4.

Application stands disposed of. JUDGEKavita

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 5114 of 2019). ← Search more judgments