Chhabilal v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 10 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the above-mentioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after…
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding Respondent No. 2, /Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sagdi, District Azamgarh, to decide the recall application dated 19.07.2002, (Computerized Case No. pending in Case No. 94/2001-2002 T200215060700003), titled Dawar and others vs. Ram Awadh and others, under Section 229-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, expeditiously within a stipulated time frame as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, in accordance with law, in the interest of justice. "
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above-mentioned recall application is pending consideration since 2002 and the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
Since the above-mentioned recall application is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
Operative part
In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the above-mentioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. May 6, 2026 Rishabh (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.