Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Uttar Pradesh v. Jitendra Kumar, Prasoon Tomar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Heard Sri Jitendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Scheme of Administration was amended in the year 1991 and by which the management of the school is to be undertaken by the members of the school itself. He further submits that subsequent to the amendment in Section 16A of the Intermediate Education Act, 1921, the management would vest in the general body of the society.
Matter requires consideration.
Issue notice to respondent no. 5. Steps to be taken within a week.
List on the date fixed in the notice.
It is made clear that the pendency of the writ petition shall not be treated to be any indulgence made by the Court in any of the matter pending. February 18, 2026 Jaideep/- (Vivek Saran,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.