✦ Allahabad High Court

Renu Gupta v. Chandra Mishra

AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. 5552 of 2026DINESH PATHAK2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition is disposed of. April 20, 2026 (Dinesh Pathak,J.)

Judgment

4.

Sri Awadhesh Kumar Shukla, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents No. 1 to 5 has contended that the grievance of the present petitioner can be more appropriately redressed by the Regional Level Committee, respondent No. 4, and he has no objection, in case, a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation to be moved by the petitioner within such stipulated period as may be directed by this Court.

5.

In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the Regional Level Committee, respondent No. 4, to ventilate his grievance, as averred in the present writ petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the present writ petition, and, in turn, he shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date of production of such representation.

Operative part

6.

With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition is disposed of. April 20, 2026 (Dinesh Pathak,J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. 5552 of 2026). ← Search more judgments