Sri Tej Prakash Agrawal & Anr. v. Mangal
Judgment
Sri Tej Prakash Agrawal and another Manoj Kumar Saxena and 17 others Versus .....Petitioner(s) .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) : Pranay Krishna : Mohammad Ahsan Ansari, Shiv Mangal Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In view of the fact that in Writ-A No. 6005 of 2025, arising out of the order passed by the Tribunal in Original Application No. 437 of 2024, decided on 21.01.2025, interim order has been granted today, further proceedings in Civil Contempt Petition No. 145 of 2025, pending before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad, shall remain stayed.
Connect with Writ-A No. 6005 of 2025. May 5, 2026 AHA/Jyotsana (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Arun Bhansali, CJ)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.