✦ Supreme Court of India · 09 May 2025

MANOJ HEMANT CHAVAN v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. It is made clear that no ad-interim relief is granted by this Court. [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1332 OF 2025 MANOJ HEMANT CHAVAN ….. APPLICANT VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ….. RESPONDENT Adv. Kshitish Shukla for the Applicant. Mr. Avinash A. Naik, A.P.P. for the State. Adv. Rahil Siddiqui for the Intervener. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 9th MAY, 2025 P.C. :- The learned counsel for the applicant on instructions from the client submits that the matter be kept beyond vacation.

#2. At the request made by the learned counsel for the applicant, stand over to 17th June, 2025.

#3. It is made clear that no ad-interim relief is granted by this Court. [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Supreme Court of India or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments