✦ Bombay High Court · 17 Jun 2026

Ramakant Yeshwant Nakharekar & Anr. v. Prakalpa Vilas Nakharekar

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. The Interim Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b).

Judgment

Ms. Sayali Apte i/b. Mr. P. G. Lad, Advocates, for the Petitioners Mr. Sagar Batavia i/b. Mr. L. M. Acharya, Advocates, for the Respondent Ms. Kirtimala Vallabh Parmar, Respondent No. 1(a) present Mr. Kaustubh Vallabh Parmar, Respondent No. 1(d) present CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 17.06.2026 P. C. INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4202 OF 2026

#1. This Interim Application is filed to bring on record a new trustee of the trust and delete name of the old trustee, who has died.

#2. Newly added Respondent Nos. 1(a) & 1(d) are present in Court. They have no objection, if the Interim Application is allowed.

#3. I have heard learned Counsel for the respective parties and I have also gone through the contents of the Interim Application.

#4. I am satisfied that a case is made out to allow the Interim Application.

#5. The Interim Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b).

#6. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4204 OF 2026

#1. This Interim Application is filed to bring on record legal heirs of Anand 2 of 3 the deceased Respondent.

#38. WP 4942-2002.doc

#2. Newly added Respondent Nos. 1(a) & 1(d) are present in Court. They have no objection, if the Interim Application is allowed.

#3. I have heard learned Counsel for the respective parties and I have also gone through the contents of the Interim Application.

#4. I am satisfied that a case is made out to allow the Interim Application.

#5. The Interim Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b).

#6. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. WRIT PETITION NO. 4942 OF 2002

#1. The aforesaid Petition be listed on 07.07.2026 under the caption “For Final Hearing”.

#2. Both the parties to file a compilation of document, short synopsis along with their preposition of law and authorities relied upon by them within two weeks from today. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Anand 3 of 3

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 4942 of 2002). ← Search more judgments