✦ Bombay High Court · 17 Sep 2025

Ismail Husain Shaikh @ Taufiq Cheena v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Writ Petition No. 2192 of 2025S GADKARI, RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, A S GADKARI

Case at a glance

Order date
17 Sep 2025
Bench
S GADKARI, RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, A S GADKARI

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2192 OF 2025 Ismail Husain Shaikh @ Taufiq Cheena … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents ______________________ Mr. Shivamsinh Deshmukh for Petitioner. Mr. Shreekant V. Gavand, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State. ______________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ. DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER 2025 P.C.:- 1) Leave to amend to incorporate additional grounds for assailing the Order of detention in the Petition, granted.

1.1) 2) Amendment be carried out within one week from today. Learned APP is directed to file reply of the concerned Authorities within a period of one week thereafter. Stand over to 7th October 2025. To be listed under the caption ‘For Hearing’, at the end of the 3)

3.1) Board. (RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.)

(A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 2192 of 2025). ← Search more judgments