✦ Bombay High Court · 03 Jan 2023

Ashraf Abdul Sattar Memom v. The State Of Maharashtra

Writ Petition No. 960 of 2022PRAKASH D NAIK, A S GADKARI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Petition is disposed off as withdrawn

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.960 OF 2022 Ashraf Abdul Sattar Memom … Petitioner V/s. The State Of Maharashtra … Respondent Mr. Anand Mishra i/b Mr. Ashok M. Saraogi for Petitioner. Mr. Ajay Patil APP, for Respondent-State. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATE : 3rd JANUARY, 2023. P.C. :

1.

After hearing learned Advocate for Petitioner at length, when this Court was not inclined to grant any relief, learned Advocate on instructions seeks leave to withdraw present petition unconditionally. Leave granted.

Operative part

2.

Petition is disposed off as withdrawn. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

(A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed off as withdrawn

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 03 Jan 2023. The bench was PRAKASH D NAIK, A S GADKARI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 960 of 2022). ← Search more judgments