✦ Bombay High Court

Judgment · High Court

Writ Petition No. 398 of 2026ANIL S KILOR, RAJ D WAKODE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Raj D. Wakode J.) (Anil S. Kilor J.) Andurkar.

Judgment

50-WP-398-20261IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.WRIT PETITION NO.398 OF 2026 Late Prashantbhau Jr. College, through it Hed Master, Indal TulshiramNagpure and others. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, School Education and Sports Dept. Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others._____________________________________________________________________________Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders. Shri. Bhagwan T. Parwe, Advocate h/f Shri R. D. Biradar, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr I. J Damle, AGP for Respondents 1 to 4.CORAM: ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.DATE:17 th JANUARY, 2026 .Heard Shri Bhagwan T. Parwe, learned counsel for the petitioners.

2.

An innocuous prayer is made that the directions be given to therespondent No.1 to disburse grant-in-aid from 01.11.2020 in favour of thepetitioners.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this issue can bedecided by the respondent No.1 in the light of the Government Resolutiondated 15.02.2021.

4.

Be that as it may, we direct the respondent No.1 to treat the presentpetition as a representation, and to decide the issue in the light of the abovementioned Government Resolution in accordance with law, within ten weeksfrom production of this order. 5. The respondent No.1 is further directed that decision taken becommunicated to the petitioners within two weeks thereafter.

6.

The learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to furnish a copy ofthe present petition along with a copy of this order before the concernedauthority within a period of two weeks from today.

Operative part

7.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. No costs. (Raj D. Wakode J.) (Anil S. Kilor J.) Andurkar.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 398 of 2026). ← Search more judgments