✦ Court unavailable · 27 Aug 2025

Vijay Kumar Jaiswal v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition is disposed of

Judgment

: Abhishek Jaiswal, Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vishesh Rajvanshi Court No. - 39 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. Sri Vishesh Rajvanshi, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client has challenged order dated 27th August 2025 rejecting his application for issuance of character certificate. His client has been wrongly named as an accused in a criminal case. There be interference. Sri Ashim Mukherjee, learned advocate, Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State. On query he submits, he does not have instructions on view taken by the Lucknow Bench in a batch of writ petitions, lead case being Writ C no. 798 of 2024 (Anil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others) has been interfered with. Respondent no.3 is directed to issue the certificate pursuant to Anil Kumar (supra). Petitioner will communicate certified copy of this order along with copy of his application dated 27th August, 2025 to said respondent. The certificate be issued within three weeks of the communication. The writ petition is disposed of. September 26, 2025 S.C. (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on eCourts case status (search case no. AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. 34357 of 2025). ← Search more judgments