Vipin Tomar v. State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 12 May 2025
- Bench
- PRAKASH PADIA
Provisions considered
- Employees Compensation Act, 1923 s. 30
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
Judgment
After arguments, prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner to adjourn the hearing of the present case at least for two weeks.
For proper assistance of the Court, Sri S.S. Nigam, learned Senior Advocate, who is present in the Court, is appointed as Amicus-curiae. It is informed by Sri S.S. Nigam, learned Senior Advocate that against the aforesaid orders, statutory alternative remedy is available to the petitioner to file appeal as provided under Section 30 of Employees Compensation Act, 1923. It is argued that in case petitioner is ready and willing to make payment as per award, the Court could interfere under Article 226/227 of the Constitution.
Put up as fresh immediately after two weeks.
On the said date, request has been made by the Court to Sri S.S. Nigam, learned Senior Advocate to appear on behalf of the petitioner to assist the Court. Order Date :- 12.5.2025/T.S.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Employees Compensation Act, 1923 — s. 30; Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 12 May 2025. The bench was PRAKASH PADIA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.