✦ Allahabad High Court · 05 Aug 2025

Sanjay Tiwari & Anr. v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P

No. 6272 of 2025SHREE PRAKASH SINGH2 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
05 Aug 2025
Bench
SHREE PRAKASH SINGH
Neutral citation
2025:AHC-LKO:45446

Outcome

Disposed of

The application is disposed off accordingly

Judgment

Operative part

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed for quashing the impugned charge sheet no.01 of 2025 of Case Crime No. 504 of 2024 under Section 408 I.P.C. P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya as well as impugned summoning order dated 20.5.2025 of Case No.8761 of 2025 "State Vs. Sanjay Tiwari & another" passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ayodhya. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. The applicants have not committed alleged offence. On the other hand, learned AGA has submitted that prima facie, the offence is made out against the applicants. It is further submitted that these are disputed questions of fact, which can be adjudicated only after adducing the evidence. He further controverts the submissions of learned counsel for the applicants on the ground that this is not a stage where minute and meticulous exercise with regard to the appreciation of evidence may be done and truthfulness of the allegations could only be tested in a criminal trial and, therefore, the application is misconceived and liable to be dismissed. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that they do not want to press the application and seek liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 SCC 51. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (supra). The application is disposed off accordingly. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Ram Murti

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is disposed off accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 408.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Allahabad High Court, on 05 Aug 2025. The bench was SHREE PRAKASH SINGH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 6272 of 2025). ← Search more judgments