✦ Court unavailable

Judgment

Case at a glance

Outcome

Bail granted

the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail

Judgment

persons. It is contended that the alleged recovery is fabricated. It is further submitted that no independent public witness has been associated with the alleged recovery, which casts serious doubt on the prosecution version. Learned counsel also submits that the offence in question is triable by a Magistrate. It is further pointed out that the applicant has explained his sole criminal antecedent in paragraph 22 of the bail application. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released from jail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. Having considered the submissions advanced, the fact that the applicant 2 BAIL No. 12741 of 2025 has satisfactorily explained the criminal antecedent of one case in paragraph 22 of the bail application, the offence is triable by a Magistrate, and the applicant is languishing in judicial custody since 03.11.2025, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Rahul, involved in Case Crime No.465 of 2025, Under Sections-3/5/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and Sections 4/25 Arms Act, Police Station- Bakshi Ka Talab, District- Lucknow, be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond two sureties each like amount the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. January 19, 2026 R.C. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955; Arms Act, 1959 — ss. 4, 25.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on eCourts case status (search case no. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 12741 of 2025). ← Search more judgments