✦ Bombay High Court

INCOMPANY PETITION NO. 1/2008 Ex-Director of Adhunik Grih Nirman Vittiya Corporation Ltd v. Official LiquidatorOffice Notes

Company Petition No. 3 of 2010ANIL L PANSARE

Case at a glance

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPURCOMPANY APPLICATION (CAL) NO. 22/2025INCOMPANY PETITION NO. 1/2008Ex-Director of Adhunik Grih Nirman Vittiya Corporation Ltd. Vs. Official LiquidatorOffice Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's ordersMr. Shriniwas Deshpande, Advocate for Official Liquidator with Mr. Deepak Persoya, Official Liquidator CORAM: ANIL L. PANSARE, J.DATED : 13th JUNE, 2025 1. By the present application, the applicants are seeking one more opportunity to comply with the order dated 02.02.2024 and to deposit the entire amount. The another prayer is for recall of the order dated 24.01.2025. So far as order dated 02.02.2024 is concerned, the counsel is seeking time. As regards order dated 24.01.2025, this Court took aid of the provisions of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 and took a view that the provisions of the MPID Act have over riding effect over the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. This Court in Company Petition No. 3 of 2010 (Sanjay Bhayyaji Nimbulkar Vs. M/s Mahadeo Land Developers) dated 21st March, 2025, after relying upon the judgments cited by the parties, took a view that the MPID Act will not have over riding effect over the provisions of 2 25-cal-22-25.odtthe Companies Act, 1956 and, therefore, the company petition will continue.

2.

In that view of the matter, the order dated 24.01.2025 is recalled.

3.

List on 27.06.2025 for further consideration as regards to the order dated 02.02.2024. (ANIL L. PANSARE, J.)MP Deshpande

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Company Petition No. 3 of 2010). ← Search more judgments