Judgment · High Court · 2018
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the petitions are dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA Date : 19/09/2018 COMMON ORAL ORDER Though called out thrice, none appears for any of the petitioners. Mr. Pavan Godiawala, learned advocate for the respondent is present. In opinion of this Court, none of the petitioners are interested in any of the matters as the matters are pending since long without any orders. In facts of this case therefore, now it is not a fit case for exercise of discretion under Sections 433 and/or 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 that too, after a long lapse of almost 20 years. Hence, the petitions are dismissed. Liberty to revive in case of difficulty. MAULIK R. PANDYA
(R.M.CHHAYA, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the petitions are dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Companies Act, 2013.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Gujarat High Court, on 19 Sep 2018. The bench was R M CHHAYA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.