Krushna Kaduba Korde v. ND MAY
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to therespondent No
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner’s Second Appeal as expeditiously as possible and in any case within eight weeks of resuming the charge. ( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( MANGESH S. PATIL…
Judgment
1930-wp-5817-2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABADWRIT PETITION NO. 5817 OF 2025 Krushna Kaduba KordeVERSUSThe State Of Maharashtra And Others...Mr. A. S. Deshpande, Advocate for the PetitionerMs. P. J. Bharad, AGP for Respondent-State...CORAM:MANGESH S. PATIL AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. Dated:02ND MAY, 2025PER COURT :-.The petitioner is anxious with the Second Appeal which has been pending with the respondent No.2 under the Right to Information Act, 2005.
On instructions, the learned AGP submits that merely, the post is vacant, whose additional charge has been with the Commissioner at Pune. New person is to join on 07 May and would need sometime to decide the Second Appeal.
Operative part
The Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner’s Second Appeal as expeditiously as possible and in any case within eight weeks of resuming the charge. ( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )Rushikesh/2025
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to therespondent No
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Right toInformation Act, 2005.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.