Writ Petition No. 29726 of 2010 · Madras High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has no objection for passing such an order. 4. In such circumstances, the impugned order of the first respondent, dated 11.8.2010, is set aside and the first respondent isdirected to reconsider the request of the petitioner…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.2.2011CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENWrit Petition No.29726 of 2010 K.MUTHULAKSHMI [ PETITIONER ] Vs1 THE SPECIAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT-CUM-CHAIRMAN STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (TRANSPORT) CHIEF SECRETARIAT PUDUCHERRY.2 THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT PUDUCHERRY.3 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT PUDUCHERRY.[ RESPONDENTS ]Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the first respondent relating the proceedings issued inNo.15059/TD/TP/2010 dated 11.08.2010 and quash the same and further direct the respondents to grant stage carriage permit to the petitioner to the route i.e.Thavalakuppam to Gorimedu via Ariyankuppam100 ft road, new bus stand, Kamban kalaiarangam GH BharathidasasanCollege Muthaiyalpet Lawspet Gorimedu. For petitioner : Mr.R.Chandrasekaran For respondents : Mr.D.Sreenivasan Government Pleader (P) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
O R D E RAt this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the impugned order of the first respondent, dated11.8.2010, may be set aside and the matter may be remitted back to the first respondent to reconsider the request of the petitioner for the grant of stage carriage permit, afresh, as prayed for by the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon.
He had also submitted that the stage carriage permit had been issued to many other persons, who are similarly situated as that of the petitioner, as per the information received by the petitioner, by the communication, dated 23.9.2010, issued under the Right to Information Act, 2005.
The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has no objection for passing such an order. 4. In such circumstances, the impugned order of the first respondent, dated 11.8.2010, is set aside and the first respondent isdirected to reconsider the request of the petitioner for the grant ofstage carriage permit, as prayed for by the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon, if there are no legal impediments for passing such an order, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. ConnectedM.P.No.1 of 2010 is closed. Sd/ Asst. Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrarlan https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ To:1 THE SPECIAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT-CUM-CHAIRMAN STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (TRANSPORT) CHIEF SECRETARIAT PUDUCHERRY.2 THE COMMISSIONER-CUM- SECRETARY STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT PUDUCHERRY.3 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT PUDUCHERRY.+1cc to Mr.R.Chandrasekaran, ADvocate Sr 14430+1cc to the Govt. Pleader cum Sr. Public Prosecutor for Pondicherry Sr 14172GR(CO)km/16.3.Writ Petition No.29726 of 2010
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.