✦ Bombay High Court · 29 Jan 2025

Markish Exim And Services Pvt. Ltd v. Mr. Yedukondalu Mahankali

Comfa No. 4 of 2025BHARATI DANGRE

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Markish Exim And Services Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Prakash D. Palav .. Appellant Versus Mr. Yedukondalu Mahankali Proprietor Shri Sai Lakshmi Gaythri … Mr. Mandar Limaye for the Appellant. .. Respondent CORAM : ALOK ARADHE, CJ & BHARATI DANGRE, J DATED : 29th JANUARY, 2025 P.C:- 1 This Appeal under Order 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, has been filed against the judgment and order dated 23/9/2024 by which the Commercial Summary Suit filed by the plaintiff has been dismissed. 2 Issue notice to the respondents, making it returnable on 20/2/2025. 3 The appellant is permitted to serve the respondents by private mode of service. (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) Tilak

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 29 Jan 2025. The bench was BHARATI DANGRE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Comfa No. 4 of 2025). ← Search more judgments