Atul Raghunath Tiwale v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 980 OF 2024 Atul Raghunath Tiwale V/S State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....PETITIONER ....RESPONDENT Adv. Harshad Sathe A/W Adv. Abhayraj Kapse, Adv. Shubham Gangan for the Petitioner. Mr. P. R. Moses for the Respondent. Smt. S. S. Kaushik, APP for the Respondent - State. CORAM : HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE & HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE, JJ DATE : 2nd July, 2024 P.C. : S. O. to 04/07/2024 . ( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I ) Page 1/1
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 980 of 2024).
← Search more judgments