Sarita Tiwari v. Kamal Kumar Kesherwani
Judgment
#1. Heard Sri Kamal Kumar Kesherwani and learned counsel for applicant and Sri Yatindra, learned counsel for the opposite party.
#2. Mr. Yatindra, learned counsel for the opposite party submitted that order of Writ Court has been complied with, therefore, this application may be dismissed as infructuous, which is not objected by counsel for applicant.
#3. Under such facts of the case no further order is required to be passed.
#4. File is consigned to the record. September 9, 2025 Monika (Neeraj Tiwari,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
eCourts case status (search case no. CIVIL) No. 5649 of 2024).
← Search more judgments