Pradnya Niketan Education Society v. State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 27 Jan 2025
- Bench
- BHARATI DANGRE
Provisions considered
Judgment
Ms.Sonali Jadhav for the petitioner. Ms.Neha Bhide, G.P with Mr.O.A. Chandurkar, Addl. G.P with Ms.G.R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for the respondent State. CORAM : ALOK ARADHE, CJ & BHARATI DANGRE, J DATED : 27th JANUARY, 2025 P.C:- 1 In this Writ Petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by its inclusion under the Right to Education Portal and has been directed to enroll 26 students under the Right to Education Quota. 2 The petitioner has challenged the validity of the communication dated 7/3/2024 issued by respondent no.2 by which the eligible schools within its jurisdiction has been asked to register on Right to Education Portal and to give admission to 48 students under the Right to Education Quota. Tilak 2/2 44 WP 9665-24.doc 3 The petitioner has challenged the notification dated 9/2/2024 on the ground that the petitioner is exempted from the ambit and purview of the Right to Education Act, 2005. 4 It is a common ground that in the aforesaid notification dated 9/2/2024, has been quashed and set aside by a Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 19/7/2024 passed in Public Interest Litigation No.61/2024. 5 For the aforementioned reasons, the Writ Petition fails and is hereby dismissed. (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) Tilak
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Right to Education Act, 2005.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 27 Jan 2025. The bench was BHARATI DANGRE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.