Wp No. 699 of 2024 · Bombaynagpur High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
923-WP-699-2024 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.WRIT PETITION NO. 699 OF 2024(M/s New Age False Ceiling Private Limited, Maharashtra, through its Director & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors.)__________________________________________________________________________Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directionsCourt's or Judge's orders.and Registrar's Orders. Mr. Bharat Raichandani, Counsel for the petitioners (throughVC).Mr. K.R. Lule, A.G.P. for respondent no.2/State. Ms Ketki Jaltare – Vaidya, Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 3to 5...... CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. NOVEMBER 28, 2025 The argument is that without giving opportunity of hearing, the order impugned is passed.2]The Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 3 to5 submits that opportunity of hearing was given.3]It, however, appears that the communication sent to the petitioner has been returned undelivered with a remark ‘unclaimed’. That being so, it cannot be said that opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner.4]The Counsel for the petitioners has invited our attention to Section 169 of The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. One of the best modes of serviceis by making notice available on common portal, which, admittedly, has been not done by the respondents.5]The Counsel for the respondents seeks time to take instructions. Granted. 923-WP-699-2024 26]List on 5/12/2025.(JUDGE) (JUDGE)Sumit
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.