✦ Orissa High Court

ACC India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi v. Khushi Realcon Pvt. Ltd., Bhubaneswar

ORISSA AT CUTTACK ARBP No. 72 of 2023

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The arbitration petition is disposed of accordingly

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and on consent of learned counsel for the parties, the Court appoints Mr. Justice Biswajit Mohanty, Former Judge of this Court, as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The arbitration…

Judgment

Mr. Anal Kumar Ghosh, Advocate and Ms. Sagarika Sahoo, Advocate -Versus- Khushi Realcon Pvt. Ltd., Bhubaneswar …. Opposite Party Mr. Subir Palit, Senior Advocate along with Mr. A. Kejriwal, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORDER 12.07.2024 This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. Order No.

2.

The present petition under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeks appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes involved in the present petition.

Operative part

3.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and on consent of learned counsel for the parties, the Court appoints Mr. Justice Biswajit Mohanty, Former Judge of this Court, as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The arbitration shall take place under the aegis of the High Court of Orissa, Arbitration Centre. The arbitration petition is disposed of accordingly. A copy of

4.

this order be communicated to the learned Arbitrator forthwith. Chief Justice (Chakradhari Sharan Singh) M. Panda. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MRUTYUNJAYA PANDA Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 22-Jul-2024 17:44:49

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The arbitration petition is disposed of accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11(6).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK ARBP No. 72 of 2023). ← Search more judgments