✦ Orissa High Court

Rasbihari Panda v. Satyabrata Sahu, I.A.S & Anr.

ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC(CPC) No. 153 of 2013BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Case at a glance

Bench
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Accordingly, CONTC(CPC) is disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha

Judgment

ORDER 13.10.2022 Order No

1.

This matter taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2.

Heard Mr. L.K. Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. M.K. Balabantaray, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.

3.

This is an application seeking compliance of the order dtd.13.12.2012 passed in O.A. No.3722 of 2001. It is submitted that the said order was challenged by the State-Opp. Parties before this Court in W.P.(C) No.22401 of 2013 and this Court vide order dtd.28.06.2022 was pleased to dismiss the same.

4.

In view of the said order passed by this Court, O.P. Nos.1 & 2 are directed to comply with the order dtd.13.12.2012 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, otherwise it will be treated as violation of Court’s order.

5.

Accordingly, CONTC(CPC) is disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC(CPC) No. 153 of 2013). ← Search more judgments