✦ Orissa High Court

Kalu Charan Swain v. D.G. And I.G. of Police & Ors.

ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C)(OA) No. 2121 of 2017BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Considering the submission that during pendency of the criminal trial, filing of defence by the Petitioner in the disciplinary proceeding will jeopardize the prospect of the delinquent Petitioner involving the vigilance case, this Court finds support of the submission of learned counsel for the…
  • Para 44. With the aforesaid direction, the writ Petition stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha

Judgment

ORDER 05.09.2022 Order No

01.

1. This matter taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

3.

Considering the submission that during pendency of the criminal trial, filing of defence by the Petitioner in the disciplinary proceeding will jeopardize the prospect of the delinquent Petitioner involving the vigilance case, this Court finds support of the submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner has also the support of decision of the Hon’ble apex Court reported in AIR 1999 SC 1416, decided by taking support of the old decision of the Hon’ble apex Court reported in AIR 1965 SC 155. This Court accordingly disposes of the writ Petition directing stay of the Disciplinary proceeding under Annexure-2 series involving the Petitioner finalization of the Criminal Trial vide Sambalpur Vigilance P.S. Case No.47 dtd.01.12.2014 pending in the Court of learned Special Judge (Vigilance), Keonjhar in G.R. No.12 of // 2 // 2014(V). This Court also directs the trial involving G.r. Case No. 12 of 2014(V) be expedited and concluded within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this Order.

4.

With the aforesaid direction, the writ Petition stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Orissa High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C)(OA) No. 2121 of 2017). ← Search more judgments