Subhendu Kumar Pradhan v. State of Odisha & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- B R SARANGI
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Considering the submission that during pendency of the criminal trial, filing of defence by the petitioner in the disciplinary proceeding will jeopardize the prospect of the delinquent- petitioner involving the criminal case, this Court finds support of the submission of learned counsel has also…
- Para 44. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. Ashok (Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
Judgment
Mr. P.K. Mishra, Adv. -Versus - State of Odisha and another …. Opposite Parties Addl. Government Advocate. CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI ORDER 06.01.2022 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Heard Mr. P.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Government Advocate appearing for the State.
Considering the submission that during pendency of the criminal trial, filing of defence by the petitioner in the disciplinary proceeding will jeopardize the prospect of the delinquent- petitioner involving the criminal case, this Court finds support of the submission of learned counsel has also the support of decision of the Hon’ble apex Court reported in AIR 1999 SC 1416, decided taking support of the old decision of the Hon’ble apex Court reported in AIR 1965 SC 155. This Court accordingly disposes of the writ petition directing stay of the Disciplinary Proceeding/memorandum No.19007/PR&DW dated 05.11.2021 under Annexure-1 involving the petitioner till finalization of the Criminal Trial vide Bhubaneswar Vigilance P.S. Case No.06/2021 dated 28.01.2021 pending in the court of Special Judge, Vigilance, Bhubaneswar in VGR Case No.05 of 2021. This Court also directs the trial involving VGR Case No.05 of 2021 be expedited.
With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. Ashok (Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.