State of Odisha & Anr. v. Dr. Geeta Ray & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
As a result, the appeal is dismissed
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed. As a result, the appeal is dismissed. However, the question of law raised in the present case is left open for consideration in some other appropriate cases. Chief Justice (Dr. S. Muralidhar) M. Panda Signature…
Judgment
Mr. Arnav Behera, ASC …. Respondents Mr. S. Jena, Advocate CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE Order No. ORDER 28.06.2023 I.A. No.1222 of 2019 and FAO No.891 of 2019
The extraordinary delay of 222 days in filing the appeal has not been properly explained. It does not satisfy the requirement as explained by the Supreme Court of India in Chief Post Master General v. Living Media India Ltd. (2012) 3 SCC 563 and The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bherulal (2020) 10 SCC 654.
Operative part
Consequently, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed. As a result, the appeal is dismissed. However, the question of law raised in the present case is left open for consideration in some other appropriate cases. Chief Justice (Dr. S. Muralidhar) M. Panda Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MRUTYUNJAYA PANDA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 30-Jun-2023 14:02:57
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.